Although neural networks are powerful function approximators, the underlying modelling assumptions ultimately define the likelihood and thus the model class they are parameterizing. In classification, these assumptions are minimal as the commonly employed softmax is capable of representing any discrete distribution over a finite set of outcomes. In regression, however, restrictive assumptions on the type of continuous distribution to be realized are typically placed, like the dominant choice of training via mean-squared error and its underlying Gaussianity assumption. Recently, modelling advances allow to be agnostic to the type of continuous distribution to be modelled, granting regression the flexibility of classification models. While past studies stress the benefit of such flexible regression models in terms of performance, here we study the effect of the model choice on uncertainty estimation. We highlight that under model misspecification, aleatoric uncertainty is not properly captured, and that a Bayesian treatment of a misspecified model leads to unreliable epistemic uncertainty estimates. Overall, our study provides an overview on how modelling choices in regression may influence uncertainty estimation and thus any downstream decision making process.
Maria Cervera (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)
More from the Same Authors
2021 : Uncertainty estimation under model misspecification in neural network regression »
Maria Cervera · Rafael Dätwyler · Francesco D'Angelo · Hamza Keurti · Benjamin F. Grewe · Christian Henning
2021 Poster: Posterior Meta-Replay for Continual Learning »
Christian Henning · Maria Cervera · Francesco D'Angelo · Johannes von Oswald · Regina Traber · Benjamin Ehret · Seijin Kobayashi · Benjamin F. Grewe · João Sacramento