Skip to yearly menu bar Skip to main content


Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean Estimation

Wei-Ning Chen · Dan Song · Ayfer Ozgur · Peter Kairouz

Great Hall & Hall B1+B2 (level 1) #1606
[ ]
[ Paper [ Poster [ OpenReview
Thu 14 Dec 8:45 a.m. PST — 10:45 a.m. PST

Abstract: Privacy and communication constraints are two major bottlenecks in federated learning (FL) and analytics (FA). We study the optimal accuracy of mean and frequency estimation (canonical models for FL and FA respectively) under joint communication and $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy (DP) constraints. We consider both the central and the multi-message shuffled DP models. We show that in order to achieve the optimal $\ell_2$ error under $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP, it is sufficient for each client to send $\Theta\left( n \min\left(\varepsilon, \varepsilon^2\right)\right)$ bits for FL %{\color{blue}(assuming the dimension $d \gg n \min\left(\varepsilon, \varepsilon^2\right)$)} and $\Theta\left(\log\left( n\min\left(\varepsilon, \varepsilon^2\right) \right)\right)$ bits for FA to the server, where $n$ is the number of participating clients. Without compression, each client needs $O(d)$ bits and $O\left(\log d\right)$ bits for the mean and frequency estimation problems respectively (where $d$ corresponds to the number of trainable parameters in FL or the domain size in FA), meaning that we can get significant savings in the regime $ n \min\left(\varepsilon, \varepsilon^2\right) = o(d)$, which is often the relevant regime in practice. We propose two different ways to leverage compression for privacy amplification and achieve the optimal privacy-communication-accuracy trade-offs. In both cases, each client communicates only partial information about its sample and we show that privacy is amplified by randomly selecting the part contributed by each client. In the first method, the random selection is revealed to the server, which results in a central DP guarantee with optimal privacy-communication-accuracy trade-offs. In the second method, the random data parts from the clients are shuffled by a secure shuffler resulting in a multi-message shuffling scheme with the same optimal trade-offs. As a result, we establish the optimal three-way trade-offs between privacy, communication, and accuracy for both the central DP and multi-message shuffling frameworks.

Chat is not available.