Pointillism: Probing-Based Model Compatibility for Robust Collaborative Machine Learning
Abstract
Assessing model compatibility is a key challenge in collaborative machine learning. Heterogeneous data distributions can lead to discrepancies among independently trained models that degrade performance when combined, while adversarial manipulation can introduce harmful behaviors. In both cases, reliable evaluation prior to integration is essential. Existing approaches mostly rely on parameter-space statistics, which do not reflect model behavior and are often unreliable in non-IID settings. Inspired by the pointillism art style, where images are formed from small, structured dots of color, we propose Pointillism, a probing-based framework that evaluates model compatibility directly in function space without requiring task data. The method uses structured, randomized probes sampled from an out-of-distribution space to elicit model responses. From these responses, we construct compact model signatures that capture both global prediction characteristics and class-level features. Compatibility is assessed through feature consensus, measuring cross-model agreement on class-level representations via probe transfer. This provides a behavior-centric and fine-grained view of model alignment. We apply the framework to federated learning, where consensus-based selection identifies a self-consistent subset of client models for aggregation. Experiments in federated learning demonstrate improved robustness against both untargeted and backdoor attacks, outperforming existing defense methods. Our source code is included in the supplementary material.