Skip to yearly menu bar Skip to main content


Oral Poster

Achieving Efficient Alignment through Learned Correction

Jiaming Ji · Boyuan Chen · Hantao Lou · Donghai Hong · Borong Zhang · Xuehai Pan · Tianyi (Alex) Qiu · Juntao Dai · Yaodong Yang

[ ]
 
Oral presentation: Oral Session 6B
Fri 13 Dec 3:30 p.m. PST — 4:30 p.m. PST

Abstract:

With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and ever-evolving practical requirements, finding an efficient and effective alignment method has never been more critical. However, the tension between the complexity of current alignment methods and the need for rapid iteration in deployment scenarios necessitates the development of a model-agnostic alignment approach that can operate under these constraints. In this paper, we introduce Aligner, a novel and simple alignment paradigm that learns the correctional residuals between preferred and dispreferred answers using a small model.Designed as a model-agnostic, plug-and-play module, Aligner can be directly applied to various open-source and API-based models with only one-off training, making it suitable for rapid iteration.Notably, Aligner can be applied to powerful, large-scale upstream models. It can even iteratively bootstrap the upstream models using corrected responses as synthetic human preference data, breaking through the model's performance ceiling.Our experiments demonstrate performance improvements by deploying the same Aligner model across 11 different LLMs, evaluated on the 3H dimensions (helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty).Specifically, Aligner-7B has achieved an average improvement of 68.9\% in helpfulness and 23.8\% in harmlessness across the tested LLMs while also effectively reducing hallucination.In the Alpaca-Eval leaderboard, stacking Aligner-2B on GPT-4 Turbo improved its LC Win Rate from 55.0\% to 58.3\%, surpassing GPT-4 Omni's 57.5\% Win Rate (community report). Specifically, \ours{}-7B has achieved an average improvement of 68.9\% in helpfulness and 23.8\% in harmlessness across the tested LLMs while also effectively reducing hallucination.In the Alpaca-Eval leaderboard, stacking \ours{}-2B on GPT-4 Turbo improved its LC Win Rate from 55.0\% to 58.3\%, surpassing GPT-4 Omni's 57.5\% Win Rate (community report).

Live content is unavailable. Log in and register to view live content