[Re] Reproduction Study of Variational Fair Clustering

Floor Eijkjelboom · Mark Fokkema · Anna Lau · Luuk Verheijen

Hall J #1002

Keywords: [ ReScience - MLRC 2021 ] [ Journal Track ]

[ Abstract ]
[ Poster
[Paper PDF]
Tue 29 Nov 9 a.m. PST — 11 a.m. PST


Scope of Reproducibility Variational Fair Clustering (VFC) is a general variational fair clustering framework that is compatible with a large class of clustering algorithms, both prototype-based and graph-based (Ziko et al., 2021). VFC is capable of handling large datasets and offers a mechanism that allows for a trade-off between fairness and clustering quality. We run a series of experiments to evaluate the major claims made by the authors. Specifically, that VFC is on par with SOTA clustering objectives, that it is scalable, that it has a trade-off control, and that it is compatible with both prototype-based and graph-based clustering algorithms. Methodology To reproduce the results from Ziko et al., the original code is altered by removing bugs. This code is used to perform reproduction experiments to test the four claims made by the authors, as described above. Furthermore, three replication experiments have been implemented as well: different values for the trade-off parameter and Lipschitz constants have been investigated, an alternative dataset is used, and a kernel-based VFC framework has been derived and implemented. Results We found that that three of the four claims made by Ziko et al. are supported, and that one claim is partially supported. VFC is mostly on par with SOTA clustering objectives, if the trade-off parameter and Lipschitz constant are tuned. Additionally, we verified that VFC is scalable on large-scale datasets and found that the trade-off control works as stated by the authors. Moreover, we conclude that VFC is capable of handling both prototype-based and graph-based datasets. Regarding the replicability of VFC, the experiment on the alternative dataset did not indicate that VFC is worse than SOTA baselines. The proposed kernel-based VFC performs on par with the original framework.

What was easy and difficult The original paper provides extensive theoretical derivations and explanations of the VFC approach, both through derviations and text. Moreover, the code of the original paper was publicly available. The original authors responded quickly to our mails and were very willing to discuss our results. Although the VFC code was publicly available, it was undocumented and contained some bugs that were hard to find given the lack of documentation. Moreover, there were vast differences between the implementation of the original authors and the baseline models. This required conversions between the models for the comparisons. Lastly, running the VFC code took many hours, which resulted in us not being able to run all algorithm-dataset combinations we wanted to. Communication with original authors The original authors have been approached twice. The mail contact helped clarify implementation details, particularly regarding the Ncut algorithm. The authors explained and specified the usage of the trade-off parameter and the Lipschitz constant. Additionally, they explained how they obtained the K-means baseline results. The authors have been informed about our proposed kernel-based VFC framework and replied with enthusiasm.

Chat is not available.