Population Scaling or Data Dilution? Dynamics of Local Topology Evolution in Decentralized Learning

Scaling decentralized learning changes not only the number of clients $\(N\)$, but also the dynamics of information propagation and consensus. We argue that the effect of increasing $\(N\)$ cannot be understood in isolation, because data allocation, topology-dependent mixing, and communication capacity may change simultaneously. We study these coupled effects on CIFAR-10 with $\(N\in\{10,50,100,200\}\)$, comparing a degree-two Ring, a Static Random graph, and Local-First Heuristic Evolution (LFHE), a locally adaptive topology process based on friend-of-friend discovery. The Ring provides an analytically transparent failure mode: its Metropolis spectral gap decays as $\(\Theta(N^{-2})\)$, implying progressively slower contraction of model disagreement as the population grows. Experiments show that holding the nominal local dataset size fixed substantially reduces the apparent population penalty observed when a fixed total dataset is divided among more clients. The remaining degradation depends strongly on communication structure: Ring enters a high-disagreement regime, whereas Static Random and LFHE remain close to consensus. Increasing LFHE's degree threshold further improves accuracy and consensus, but at a substantially higher model-transmission cost. These results show that decentralized scaling is governed by coupled learning and communication dynamics, rather than by the number of clients alone.